AI Scoring Methodology
Last updated: April 7, 2026
SyndTrack is not a registered investment advisor. This platform does not provide investment advice, recommendations, or solicitations. All information is for informational purposes only.
SyndTrack uses AI to generate a 0–100 deal score for each syndication in your portfolio. This page explains exactly what goes into that score, how it is calculated, where it is useful, and where it should not be relied on.
How Scoring Works
When you click “Score Deal” on any deal in your portfolio, we send the deal’s structured data to an AI model (Claude by Anthropic). The model evaluates the deal across four dimensions and returns a score for each, along with the specific factors that drove each rating up or down.
The overall score is a weighted average of the four dimension scores:
Scoring Dimensions
Sponsor Track Record
25% weightEvaluates the GP/sponsor's experience, historical performance, and credibility as an operator.
Data inputs
- Years in business and total AUM
- Number of completed deals and exits
- Historical average IRR and equity multiple
- Consistency between projected and actual returns
High score means
Proven sponsor with 10+ years, strong realized returns, and multiple successful exits.
Low score means
Limited operating history, few completed deals, or returns that consistently miss projections.
Market Conditions
20% weightAssesses the attractiveness of the asset class and geographic market at the time of scoring.
Data inputs
- Asset class (e.g., multifamily, industrial, private credit)
- Geographic location and local market fundamentals
- Supply/demand dynamics and rent growth trends
- Cap rate environment and interest rate sensitivity
High score means
Strong market fundamentals with favorable supply/demand balance and rent growth.
Low score means
Oversupplied market, unfavorable macro conditions, or location data not provided.
Deal Structure
25% weightReviews the terms, fees, and alignment of interests between the GP and LP investors.
Data inputs
- Committed capital vs. called capital ratio
- Preferred return hurdle and equity split
- Waterfall structure and promote terms
- Asset management and acquisition fees
High score means
LP-friendly terms with strong preferred returns, reasonable fees, and clear alignment.
Low score means
Unfavorable LP terms, high fee load, or key structural details not disclosed.
Return Projections
30% weightScrutinizes financial assumptions, stated targets, and how actual performance compares to projections.
Data inputs
- Target IRR and cash-on-cash yield
- Projected MOIC and exit assumptions
- Actual distributions vs. projected distributions (DPI)
- Total value relative to invested capital (TVPI)
High score means
Realistic projections supported by actual distributions that track or exceed targets.
Low score means
Aggressive assumptions, no realized returns to validate projections, or insufficient data.
Score Scale
Both the overall score and each dimension score use the same 0–100 scale:
Confidence Indicator
Every score displays a confidence level based on how complete the underlying data is. More populated fields mean higher confidence.
Most data fields are populated. The score is based on substantial evidence.
Some data gaps exist. The model fills gaps with neutral assumptions (scores of 40–50 for missing dimensions).
Significant data is missing. The score should be treated as a rough directional indicator only.
Data Sources
The scoring model uses only the structured data you have entered into SyndTrack for each deal:
- Deal details — name, asset class, location, committed and called capital, target IRR, preferred return, waterfall position, hold period, and vintage year.
- Sponsor profile — display name, total AUM, years in business, number of deals, average IRR, and average equity multiple.
- Transaction history — total capital calls, total distributions, and transaction count.
- Projections — projected IRR and projected MOIC, when available.
- Document count — number of uploaded deal documents (documents are not read by the scoring model).
The model does not have access to the internet, third-party databases, or any data outside of what you provide. It does not read the contents of uploaded documents.
Known Limitations
- Scores reflect data quality — If deal data is incomplete, the model assigns neutral scores (40–50) for missing dimensions. A low score may reflect missing data rather than a poor deal.
- No real-time market data — The model does not access live interest rates, cap rates, or comparable sales. Market condition scores are based on asset class and location only.
- AI model variability — Scores may vary slightly between runs as AI models are updated. Historical scores are preserved so you can compare over time.
- Single-deal scope — Each deal is scored independently. The model does not consider portfolio-level diversification or correlation between your deals.
- No qualitative analysis — The model cannot evaluate sponsor reputation beyond the numbers you provide. It does not account for personal relationships, legal disputes, or news events.
What the Score Does NOT Capture
The AI deal score is a structured analysis of the data you provide. It is not a recommendation and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Specifically, the score does not account for:
- Your personal financial situation, risk tolerance, or investment goals
- Tax implications specific to your jurisdiction or entity structure
- Legal terms in offering documents beyond what is captured in structured fields
- Sponsor character, communication quality, or investor relations track record
- Macroeconomic forecasts, geopolitical risk, or regulatory changes
- Correlation with your existing portfolio or concentration risk
When the Score Is Useful
- Comparing deals side by side — Scores provide a consistent framework for evaluating multiple opportunities on the same criteria.
- Identifying data gaps — Low confidence or low dimension scores often highlight missing information you should request from the sponsor.
- Tracking changes over time — Re-scoring a deal after new data (distributions, valuations) shows how the deal is performing against expectations.
- Starting due diligence — The factor breakdown highlights areas that warrant deeper investigation before committing capital.
Important Disclaimer
SyndTrack is not a registered investment advisor. This platform does not provide investment advice, recommendations, or solicitations. All information is for informational purposes only. AI-generated scores are provided as an analytical tool to help organize your thinking. They are not predictions of future performance and should not replace professional financial, legal, or tax advice. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.
Questions
If you have questions about how scoring works or want to report an issue with a score, contact us at support@syndtrack.io.